Cloud sweater costing with a low MOQ manufacturer

If you’re planning a small run of a soft, “cloud” hand-feel sweater, unit economics can make or break the launch. This guide shows you exactly how to structure cloud sweater costing for a low MOQ order, using a transparent worksheet and a worked example: 12gg, ~400 g, cotton/acrylic blend, split across 2 colors × 50 units each (100 total).

Key takeaways

• Cost knitwear by weight first; then layer labor, finishing, branding, freight, and duties. Use a simple, transparent worksheet to keep assumptions visible.

• Model three scenarios (Low/Medium/High) to see sensitivity to yarn price, waste %, knitting CM, and freight. This prevents surprises when quotes shift.

• Color splits and branding amortization move the needle at low MOQ. Treat per-color inputs explicitly instead of averaging.

• Plan freight and launch timing early. Add seasonal buffers (e.g., around Chinese New Year) to avoid missing your selling window.

What we’re costing and the baseline assumptions

We’ll cost a “cloud” sweater using this baseline:

• Construction: 12gg, seamless-capable path, cotton/acrylic blend

• Weight: ~400 g per piece (size M target); S–XL standard curve

• Quantity: 100 units total, 2 colors × 50 units each

• Approach: three-scenario sensitivity (Low/Medium/High)

For knitwear, a reliable rule of thumb is to anchor costs on garment weight because yarn is a substantial share of total cost. As the Centre for the Promotion of Imports notes, “the cost price of knitwear is often calculated based on the weight of the item.” See the market-entry guidance in the CBI document, cited as the principle for weight-based costing: CBI knitwear market entry guidance for knitwear costing by weight.

Gauge affects feel and productivity; our 12gg choice sits on the finer side for staple sweaters. For additional context on gauge behaviors and how brands pick gauges by category, see this overview: Sweater types by gauge — how gauge influences weight and handle.

Build the step-by-step costing worksheet

Use these inputs and formulas. Keep variables editable so you can dial in supplier quotes and confirm with sampling tests.

Inputs to expose (per color where relevant):

1. Garment weight (g) and units per color

2. Yarn price per kg (stock-service vs custom dye)

3. Utilization and waste % (for cone tails, swatching, color changes, WHOLEGARMENT programming tests)

4. Programming fee (WHOLEGARMENT path; fixed per style or amortized)

5. Knitting CM per unit (factory adjustable)

6. Finishing & MTP per unit (labels, hangtag, poly/kraft, folding)

7. Branding amortization (boxes, inserts at lot or per-color level)

8. QA/testing (optional; e.g., pilling, shrinkage, colorfastness)

9. Freight mode and spend; duties % if landed basis

10. Pricing anchor: target MSRP and margin

Core formulas (copy to your sheet):

Garment_kg = Garment_grams / 1000
Total_units = Sum(units_per_color)
Yarn_required_kg = (Garment_kg * Total_units) / Utilization_factor
Waste_kg = Yarn_required_kg * Waste_pct
Yarn_cost_total = (Yarn_required_kg + Waste_kg) * Yarn_price_per_kg
Yarn_cost_per_unit = Yarn_cost_total / Total_units
Programming_fee_per_unit = Programming_fee_total / Total_units
Knitting_CM_per_unit = input value (factory-specific)
Finishing_MTP_per_unit = Trims + Labels + Hangtag + Bag + Folding
Branding_amort_per_unit = Branding_lot_cost / Allocation_units (lot or per-color)
Freight_per_unit = Freight_total / Shipped_units
Duty_per_unit = (Duty_pct * (FOB_per_unit)) if calculating landed
FOB_per_unit = Yarn_cost_per_unit + Programming_fee_per_unit + Knitting_CM_per_unit + Finishing_MTP_per_unit + Trims_Packaging_per_unit + Branding_amort_per_unit
Landed_per_unit = FOB_per_unit + Freight_per_unit + Duty_per_unit
Margin_check = (MSRP - Landed_per_unit) / MSRP

Note on evidence and assumptions:

• The weight-first approach is grounded in CBI’s guidance linked above.

• WHOLEGARMENT reduces seaming labor; newer machines report meaningful productivity improvements over earlier models. Shima Seiki reports “more than 25%” productivity improvement in recent platform updates; see: Shima Seiki press note on productivity improvements (2024). Treat minutes-per-piece as a factory input, not a public constant.

Worked example: 12gg cloud sweater costing (2 colors × 50 units)

Below are illustrative Low/Medium/High scenarios. Replace the defaults with your supplier’s quotes. Keep duty as a separate, adjustable line depending on ship-to country.

Assumption ranges (edit these):

Per-unit breakdown (baseline: 400 g × 100 units; Utilization factor = 1.00 for simplicity; adjust if your factory advises differently):

• Garment_kg = 0.40; total yarn required before waste = 40.0 kg

• Waste_kg = 2.4 / 3.6 / 4.8 kg (L/M/H)

• Chargeable yarn kg = 42.4 / 43.6 / 44.8 kg

How to use it with pricing anchors

• If your MSRP target is $168 with a 60% gross margin target, your implied landed cost ceiling is $67.20. All three scenarios clear that ceiling comfortably—leaving room for wholesale splits or promotions. If you anchor instead on “ex‑works ≤ $32,” check the Subtotal FOB per unit row: only the High scenario risks approaching that threshold as complexity rises.

Why the ranges matter

• Yarn price, waste %, and knitting CM drive most of the variance. Keep the worksheet live during sampling so you can update each input quickly as quotes evolve.

WHOLEGARMENT vs fully-fashioned: cost levers you should model

WHOLEGARMENT can remove most linking labor, shifting effort to programming and flow. Shima Seiki reports material productivity gains over prior models, supporting faster throughput and fewer seam operations; see: Shima Seiki’s note on >25% productivity uplift (2024). Use an adjustable programming-fee line and a knitting CM input rather than guessing minutes.

When comparing construction methods, balance labor and material implications. A concise overview of method trade‑offs lives here: Fully-fashioned vs cut-and-sew — cost and quality trade-offs. For finishing steps that remain (washing, blocking, labels, packing), this explainer helps you scope MTP accurately: Knitwear finishing and assembly — steps and cost drivers.

Color splits and MOQ realities at small volumes

At 2 colors × 50 units, per‑color dynamics matter:

• Yarn source method: Stock‑service colors minimize per‑color risk; custom dye often requires higher MOQs or surcharges. Treat yarn price/kg by color as separate inputs.

• Setup and testing: More colors mean more cone changes and tests; keep waste% conservative until sampling validates.

• Branding amortization: If boxes or inserts come in lot sizes of 500–1,000, spreading them across only 100 units raises per‑unit cost; choose per‑lot or per‑color allocation based on your packaging plan.

For perspective on supplier landscapes and MOQs, see this overview aimed at brand teams: Best China knitwear supplier list — MOQ and capability snapshots. (Use it to frame expectations, then confirm the specifics with your vendor.)

Freight timelines and buffers for a 100‑piece drop

Small knitwear shipments typically move by ocean (FCL/LCL) or air/express for urgent capsules. Plan your launch window backward from delivery and add seasonal buffers.

Transit benchmarks you can plan against

• China → US, door‑to‑door ranges vary by port and mode. Industry guides suggest the following planning windows:

  • To US West Coast, ocean FCL can often run about 18–28 days door‑to‑door; LCL adds consolidation time. See planning context in this transpacific explainer: SEKO Logistics guide to Asia→North America planning (2025).

  • Air and express significantly cut transit time but raise per‑unit freight cost. For a current comparison oriented to SMB shippers, see: NextSmartShip’s China→US shipping overview (Jan 2026).

Seasonal buffers

• Chinese New Year 2026 begins Feb 17, with congestion building weeks before and normalizing several weeks after. Build extra time into your plan; guidance on peak patterns is summarized by Maersk’s seasonal brief: Peak periods and Chinese New Year planning for 2026.

Practical worksheet buffers to expose

• Standard: +7–10 days WC routes; +10–14 days EC routes

• Peak/CNY: +10–14 days WC; +14–21 days EC

• High‑risk plans: consider +14–21 days WC; +21–28 days EC

Templates and checks you can reuse

• RFQ email opener: “We’re costing a 12gg cotton/acrylic sweater at ~400 g, 2 colors × 50 units. Please quote yarn price/kg per color (stock vs custom), waste% assumptions, WHOLEGARMENT programming fee (if any), knitting CM/unit, finishing/MTP, trims/packaging, branding setup costs, and standard freight options with transit windows.”

• QC checklist snapshot: request wash/shrinkage test (<3% target), pilling index target, colorfastness to rubbing/wash, and final measurements with ±1.5 cm tolerance. Confirm AQL and rework policy in writing.

Example partner note (disclosure and practical use case)

Disclosure: Xindi Knitwear is our product.

For low‑MOQ capsules where per‑color risk is high, a partner like Xindi Knitwear can sometimes source stock‑service cotton/acrylic colors and turn a tech‑pack sample in 3–5 days, which lets you validate yarn yield and waste% before committing to custom dye. Keep the mention in your worksheet as a variable: if stock is available, reduce waste% and amortize branding over a larger combined lot; if custom dye is required, increase the per‑color yarn/kg and keep buffers higher until PPS approval.

Closing next steps

Duplicate the worksheet, drop in your factory’s quotes, and run the three scenarios. Validate waste% and programming fees during sampling, confirm freight buffers with your forwarder around seasonal peaks, and then lock the numbers for your PO window.