Fully-Fashioned vs Cut & Sew Knitwear: OEM/ODM Technical Guide for Brands
Fully-fashioned and cut & sew are the two dominant manufacturing methods in the knitwear industry. Each method affects silhouette precision, garment stability, production efficiency, sustainability, and cost.
For OEM/ODM factories, choosing the correct construction technique determines the required gauge, yarn selection, machine type, linking method, finishing procedures, and overall production quality.
This guide provides a complete technical comparison of both methods to help brands select the optimal manufacturing route for their knitwear programs.
What Is Fully-Fashioned Knitwear?
Definition
Fully-fashioned knitwear is produced by shaping garment panels directly on flat knitting machines. Panels are created to match the final silhouette — with no cutting required.
Key Characteristics
Panels shaped on-machine (neckline, armhole, shoulder)
Minimal cut edges, minimal waste
Assembled using loop-to-loop linking
Premium appearance with smoother transitions
High durability
Factory Behavior
Requires advanced programming (Shima Seiki / STOLL / Cixing)
Precision needle selection controls shaping
Linking accuracy determines final appearance
When Fully-Fashioned Works Best
Complex cable or textured sweaters
Luxury fine-gauge knitwear (12–18GG)
Structured silhouettes with clean armholes
Premium menswear and womenswear
Cashmere, merino, silk blends
What Is Cut & Sew Knitwear?
Definition
Cut & sew knitwear is produced by knitting fabric yardage first, then cutting shapes using garment patterns, and sewing panels using overlock or cover stitches.
Key Characteristics
Fabric knitted in sheets
Panels cut using patterns
Easy to modify fit and shape
Fast sampling cycle
High scalability
Factory Behavior
Knit yardage → relax → cut → sew → finish
Requires precision cutting tools
Suitable for fabrics that cannot be fully-fashioned
When Cut & Sew Works Best
Knit tops, dresses, skirts
Fine jersey fabrics (cotton/viscose/modal)
Athleisure and fashion basics
Hybrid garments (woven + knit)
High-volume fast fashion
Fully-Fashioned: Technical Advantages & Limitations
Advantages
Premium Aesthetic
Smooth armhole transitions
Clean neckline shaping
No overlock seam bulk
Superior Durability
Loop-to-loop linking creates stronger joints
Lower Waste
Panels shaped directly → sustainable
Better Shape Retention
Ideal for rib structures, cables, and complex stitch designs
Limitations
Slower Machine Time
Shaping increases production time
Higher Cost
Linking labor is expensive
More machine programming required
Not Suitable for All Fabrics
Unstable structures (loose mesh) may distort
Ultra-stretch fabrics perform poorly
Cut & Sew: Technical Advantages & Limitations
Advantages
Fast Production
Ideal for large retail programs and rapid turnover
Flexible Patterning
Easy to adjust fit during sampling or bulk
Works with lightweight, drapey fabrics
Cost-Effective
Lower machine time
Lower labor cost
Excellent for Hybrid Designs
Mixed woven/knit garments
Dresses requiring non-linear cutting
Limitations
Higher Fabric Waste
Cutting scraps usually 10–20%
Less Durable Seams
Overlock seams weaker than linking
Panel Curling Risk
Especially with jersey fabrics
Lower Premium Feel
Visible seam lines
Less shape precision
Yarn & Gauge Compatibility Comparison
Fully-Fashioned Compatible Yarns
Best Choices
Merino / extra-fine merino
Cashmere & luxury blends
Wool/nylon
High-twist viscose/nylon
Silk blends
Tencel/modal fine-gauges
Why
Stable tension → clean shaping
Ideal for advanced stitch structures
Cut & Sew Compatible Yarns
Best Choices
Cotton, organic cotton
Polyester/cotton blends
Viscose/modal/Tencel jersey
Athleisure yarns
Rib fabrics
Why
Fabric-first knitting allows versatile applications
Works well for breathable, drapey, lightweight styles
Machine Requirements & Workflow Differences
Fully-Fashioned Workflow (Factory)
H3: Step-by-Step
Yarn feeding
Shaping via needle selection
Panel knitting
Panel linking (loop-to-loop)
Final QC (shape, linking tension, stitches)
H4: Machinery
Shima Seiki WHOLEGARMENT
STOLL CMS
Cixing CX series
Linking machines (chain-stitch linking)
Cut & Sew Workflow (Factory)
H3: Step-by-Step
Knit fabric yardage
Relax fabric for 24 hours
Lay & cut using templates
Sew panels (overlock, cover stitch)
Washing & finishing
QC (seams, measurement, recovery)
H4: Machinery
Flat knitting machines for yardage
Fabric spreaders
Cutting tables or laser cutting
Overlock / coverstitch machines
Cost Breakdown: Fully-Fashioned vs Cut & Sew
Fully-Fashioned Cost Drivers
High machine programming complexity
Linking labor
More machine hours per garment
Slower production speed
More skilled workers
Typical cost:
30–50% higher than cut & sew depending on stitch depth.
Cut & Sew Cost Drivers
Fast knitting of yardage
High scalability
Less reliance on linking
Lower-skilled sewing operators
Typical cost:
10–30% lower than fully-fashioned.
Which Method Should Brands Choose?
Choose Fully-Fashioned If You Want:
Luxury appearance
High durability
Perfect rib edges
Complex cables/jacquards
Shaped silhouettes
Premium sweaters
Choose Cut & Sew If You Want:
Lightweight knit fabrics
Athleisure or yoga tops
High-volume production
Quick sampling
Lower production cost
Sustainability Comparison
Fully-Fashioned
Minimal material waste
Longer-lasting garments
Better use of premium yarns
Cut & Sew
Higher scrap percentage
More trimming waste
Works well with recycled fabrics in yardage
Fully-fashioned is inherently more sustainable due to lower waste.